|
page |
line |
comment |
|
31 |
29 |
Table 2.1 – document emphasises DRL are estabilished for specific clinical tasks and table is a miscellaneous of protocol definitions. Suggest to remove different types of radiography ….Trunk? Skull? … replace with screening mammography, projection radiography, diagnostic fluoroscopy, interventional fluoroscopy …. |
|
41 |
27 |
Table 2.1 categorizes certain examinations?! A different table perhaps with defined examinations based on clinical task. |
|
48 |
23 |
achievable dose (AD) ….instead of ….. AD …. Made me return to look for definition of AD. |
|
52 |
21 |
MTF and NPS - should briefly quote that - these quantitative measurements do not characterize the system in terms of clinical image quality (clinical task) they describe well the inherent performance of the imaging detector… |
|
67 |
32 |
patients |
|
80 |
15 |
Standard output data – no reference of what this means |
|
105 |
12 |
Should (has two ll) |
|
112 |
31 |
Both without and with enhancement with contrast material |